Tuesday, February 20, 2024

The RISE Grant and Tonight's City Council Consent Agenda

 There has been much talk around Freeport City Hall regarding something being called a RISE grant from the State of Illinois and how it will be used in Freeport.  The City hosted two public "open houses" on February 15, regading a "Freeport Economic Revovery Plan" to be "Funded by the RISE Grant" according to the open house announcement.

Looking down the consent agenda for tonight's Freeport City Council meeting I ran across a payment to Fehr-Graham in the amount of $15,000 attributable to the DCEO RISE GRANT DWT with the acccount number 205-268-6315.  Below is picture of this page of tonight's  consent agenda with this item underlined.


So using the account number, I went back to the appropriations ordinance, approved by the City Council last December,  to look at the corresponding fund this payment was being pulled from.


What I found has only led to more questions.  Below is a picture of the appropriations ordinance regarding this RISE grant.


What I find troubling is that the account shows a negative $22,500 for last year.  What's the explanation for this number being there?  I'm no CPA but I  know numbers in an appropriation ordinance mean something.  I also suspect, although I am no CPA that somewhere within the appropriations ordinance this negative $22,500 should show up as a postive in the same amount lest the city council approved layout is not balanced.  The public and council should know if the appropriations ordinance was written unbalanced.

How much of this $75,000 grant is left?  What has it been used for thus far?  What percentage of these grants actually go into projects and what percentage in engineering fees?

Any member of the Freeport City Council can ask for an item to be removed from the consent agenda for full council discussion.  I would like to see that happen in the case illustrated here.  That negative $22,500 needs explanation and the public, as well as the city council, need to know exactly what they've gotten for the $15,000 Fehr-Graham is billing us for in regards to this grant.

Surely, Mayor Miller or City Manager Boyer should be able to explain both of these issues to the satisfaction of the City Council withou too much effort or time.

As always, yours in honesty,

John Samuel Cook
2024

tutty.baker@gmail.com


Thursday, February 15, 2024

Another Home Rule Sales Tax Proposal--Same Tired Justifications

 I watched with interest the discussion regarding Freeport streets and how to fund the repairing of the same at the Committee of the Whole meeting of the Freeport City Council on February 12th this year.  The video of the meeting is available on YouTube.

Second ward alderman James Monroe appeared to speak in favor of using home rule to raise Freeport's sales tax yet again, the substance of what Mr. Monroe said is below and quoted verbatim.

"It's something that has to be addressed and we have to figure a path forward and the only way to do that is to work to together and to continue to push forward, to continue to execute on a plan and and that's the only way it ever gets done.  It's just like a business, and we're looking at this from a standpoint, and this is why earlier--the conversations--because a tax increase only gets us part of the way there; the conversations with the Greater Freeport Partnership and the growth of Lamm Road TIF district and other TIF districts in the city, other economic zones is the important piece because bringing new blood, new money in the community, new jobs will fund all this."



This is basically the same argument that has always been used by City officials when they want to use home rule to raise the sales on the rest of us living in the city...or at least on those who have no choice and lack the ability to purchase goods and services outside of Freeport.

In the fall of  2009 the administration of Mayor George Gaulrapp proposed a sales tax increase at the same time the Wal-Mart and Menard's shopping complex was under construction.  Mayor Gaulrapp using the same justification, went so far as to tell the public that once these new mega-stores "come on line" this new tax "will go away."  My alderman, Tom Klemm, should remember this as plain as day.

The fact is, as stated in the prior post, "The increases in Freeeport's home rule sales tax has literally paralleled Freeport's decline."  There is an anolagy somewhere about doing the same things over and over expecting different results if my recall is correct.

Another issue I will take with Mr. Monroe's statement is where he stated, "It's just like a business."  Really?  I've worked my whole life in the private sector;  vegetable farms, manufacturing, service and distribution industries and retail, from ma and pa outfits to a Fortune 100 company and I've yet to see a private sector business that can just conjure up revenue as the City of Freeport can with home rule powers.

If Mr. Monroe can point out a business that can simply raise it's bottom line by placing an involuntary tax upon its own shareholders, I'd be interested in hearing more about that business.  If the company I work for sells considerably less product this year than last and they are short of revenue they have to make adjustments on the expense side of the ledger.  An Ivy League degree should not be needed to understand this simple business truth.

Freeport households have to behave as businesses do, very few of us have the ability, skills, or time to magically increase the stream of money coming into our homes.  If a household's expenses continue to outstrip its revenue, something has to give. 

While we citizens can do little to nothing to raise our incomes the Freeport City Manager, Mayor Jodi Mill and the Freeport City Council have little problem using home rule to pick our pockets without so much as an official public hearing much less a referendum.

How does Rock Falls,Sterling, Dixon and even Rockford mangage without home rule powers to instantly increase their revenue when the money pot runs dry?

Have Freeport administrations simply lacked or are lacking, whether mayoral or city manager, in the managereial skills of these other communities?  Or have they simply become reliant on the get out jail free card that home rule gives them, knowing they can finance every decision regardless of how poor a decision it was?

Since the turn of the century Freeport has been bleeding profusely for a number of  reasons, while all Freeport elected officials do is cling to the status quo.  It is past the time that Mayor Miller and City Manager Bloyer do the hard job of governing that's required in 2024 and bring our expenses in line with present revenue the same way practically every other Freeport business, household or public body has to do it....the home rule card has been played far too often to what appears to be the detriment of Freeport and its citizens.

There will be more to come on this issue.

As always, yours in honesty

John Samuel Cook

2024

tutty.baker@gmail.com